Use of information contained in this blog does not constitute any contractual relationship between the reader and the author. The author hereby disclaims all responsibilities and liabilities for any use of information contained in this blog. Readers are advised to exercise due diligence and do their own assessment of the risks involved when investing in any company. Readers shall not hold the author liable for investments which have gone sour.
Sunday, January 17, 2016
CONSUMPTION COULD FALL NEXT?
Walmart to close 269 stores
Kmart to close 27 stores
JC penny to close 7 stores
Macy t close 35 stores
For those who still believe the US will hike interest rates this year, think again. This is a glaring telltale sign that the consumption driven economy in the US is going to fall off the cliff. Earlier I posted that the middle class in the US has shrunk more than 10% compared to the period in 2008 and the next worth is unchanged at the same level of the late 1980s. There is no wealth creation among the middle class in the US despite QE1-3!
The GDP to monetary base is yet another sign that all is not well in the US. When monetary base is enlarged but there is little or no wealth creation, it tells a very damaging story about the state of the US economy.
The Baltic Index gave the first hint when it started towards record new lows.
Buckle up. This is going to be a very tough year.
Thursday, January 14, 2016
COULD THE S&P FALL TO 550?
SocGen's Albert Edwards created a furore and thereafter much heated debate when he prognosticated that the S&P could fall as much as 75% to 550 due to China's devaluation.
My view: The S&P reached 683 in 2009. Since the Global Financial Crisis, global debt has increased 200% and global derivatives have increased anywhere from US$700T to US$1.5Q which is more than the US$500 plus T recorded in 2009.
US monetary base has increased 500% since then. GDP to monetary base is below that recorded during the Great Depression. During the 1997/98 Asia Financial Crisis, the US and EU were not as badly affected. In the 2008/2009 Global Financial Crisis, US and EU were badly hit, but Asia was able to power ahead though a debt fueled economy. Now the world is on the brink of yer another crisis and no major economy powerhouse is there to buffer any impact.
Currently the U6 data points to 10% unemployment. On the other hand, if we were to measure unemployment against the number of people within the employable age group, the unemployment could be close to 20%. That means 100 million Americans are without a job!
Today, we have a US economy that faces recession in earnings, recession in the oil, mining and manufacturing sectors. And now, US total debt stands at more than 300% of total GDP.
Look at the Blatic Index 402 points vs 12,000 points in 2008.
Any major crisis I believe, will be debt driven and in a deflationary economy, it could be a double whammy. Will the S&P really fall to 550? I do not know. If allowed in a freefall it could be worse than 2009. However, I am inclined to believe that the Fed will not allow the S&P to be in a freefall to 550. At 1,200 to 1,500, I think the Fed's printing press will work doubly hard, but will it be enough to stem the tide?
My view: The S&P reached 683 in 2009. Since the Global Financial Crisis, global debt has increased 200% and global derivatives have increased anywhere from US$700T to US$1.5Q which is more than the US$500 plus T recorded in 2009.
US monetary base has increased 500% since then. GDP to monetary base is below that recorded during the Great Depression. During the 1997/98 Asia Financial Crisis, the US and EU were not as badly affected. In the 2008/2009 Global Financial Crisis, US and EU were badly hit, but Asia was able to power ahead though a debt fueled economy. Now the world is on the brink of yer another crisis and no major economy powerhouse is there to buffer any impact.
Currently the U6 data points to 10% unemployment. On the other hand, if we were to measure unemployment against the number of people within the employable age group, the unemployment could be close to 20%. That means 100 million Americans are without a job!
Today, we have a US economy that faces recession in earnings, recession in the oil, mining and manufacturing sectors. And now, US total debt stands at more than 300% of total GDP.
Look at the Blatic Index 402 points vs 12,000 points in 2008.
Any major crisis I believe, will be debt driven and in a deflationary economy, it could be a double whammy. Will the S&P really fall to 550? I do not know. If allowed in a freefall it could be worse than 2009. However, I am inclined to believe that the Fed will not allow the S&P to be in a freefall to 550. At 1,200 to 1,500, I think the Fed's printing press will work doubly hard, but will it be enough to stem the tide?
IS THE PETRODOLLAR UNDER THREAT?
Many economists are projecting that saudi Arabia will likely depeg from the petrodollar to cover shortfalls in its budget which could amount to the tune of US$85B this year.
Will the depeg lead to further political tensions, and weaken the US$ hegemony in the oil trade, and worse, global trade?
Just yesterday news surfaced that come November 2016, oil could trade on the SPIMEX (St Petersburg International Mercantile Exchange) in Russian Roubles instead of US$. Just to recap, Russia is one of the larger buyers of gold. Does this mean that Russia has intention to back the Roubles with gold?
Russia is the world's largest oil producer, roughly a third of OPEC's production. Should this happen, it could impact upon the petrodollar hegemony as well.
Lastly, US GDP is expected to weaken as economic indicators are pointing to disappointing gorwth with some sectors being in recession (manufacturing, mining and oil). Even the S&P 500 earnings for Q4 is expected to be lower, then third month in negative territory. This will force the Fed's hand not to raise interest rates. As the results the US$ could weaken.
My own opinion? If two of the three conditions above are fulfilled, then we could see a weakended US$. Further upside if the Fed unleashes QE4 with negative interest rates (NIRP). Gold and silver could test historic highs.
.
Will the depeg lead to further political tensions, and weaken the US$ hegemony in the oil trade, and worse, global trade?
Just yesterday news surfaced that come November 2016, oil could trade on the SPIMEX (St Petersburg International Mercantile Exchange) in Russian Roubles instead of US$. Just to recap, Russia is one of the larger buyers of gold. Does this mean that Russia has intention to back the Roubles with gold?
Russia is the world's largest oil producer, roughly a third of OPEC's production. Should this happen, it could impact upon the petrodollar hegemony as well.
Lastly, US GDP is expected to weaken as economic indicators are pointing to disappointing gorwth with some sectors being in recession (manufacturing, mining and oil). Even the S&P 500 earnings for Q4 is expected to be lower, then third month in negative territory. This will force the Fed's hand not to raise interest rates. As the results the US$ could weaken.
My own opinion? If two of the three conditions above are fulfilled, then we could see a weakended US$. Further upside if the Fed unleashes QE4 with negative interest rates (NIRP). Gold and silver could test historic highs.
.
Sunday, January 10, 2016
CHINA'S GOLD AMBITION
The dotted lines are there. But the jigsaw pieces seem loose at the moment. These are the news:
1) China is the largest importer of gold and it is the world's largest gold miner. it is estimated that for more than a decade, China has mined 2,000 tonnes of gold and imported 3,000 tonnes of gold through Hong Kong. Yet China only declared it is holding 1,700 tonnes of gold.
2) The ICBC Bank (London) has been appointed by the BOE as the clearing house for Yuan in UK.
3) Recently, ICBC Bank is rumoured to be the buyer of Duetsche Bank's 1,500 tonnes gold vault in London, and could possibly include the 200 tonne gold vault in Singapore as Duetsche Bank exits the commodity trading business.
4) China has directed all foreign banks with import licence to participate in a Yuan denominated gold benchmark from April 2016 or face curbs in their gold import operations
London - Gold - Yuan. Some interesting developments could happen in the months ahead.
I remain bullish on physical gold and silver, gold and silver mining shares, gold and silver ETFs and gold and silver mining ETFs. Remember to always do your own research as our risk appetite often differs.
1) China is the largest importer of gold and it is the world's largest gold miner. it is estimated that for more than a decade, China has mined 2,000 tonnes of gold and imported 3,000 tonnes of gold through Hong Kong. Yet China only declared it is holding 1,700 tonnes of gold.
2) The ICBC Bank (London) has been appointed by the BOE as the clearing house for Yuan in UK.
3) Recently, ICBC Bank is rumoured to be the buyer of Duetsche Bank's 1,500 tonnes gold vault in London, and could possibly include the 200 tonne gold vault in Singapore as Duetsche Bank exits the commodity trading business.
4) China has directed all foreign banks with import licence to participate in a Yuan denominated gold benchmark from April 2016 or face curbs in their gold import operations
London - Gold - Yuan. Some interesting developments could happen in the months ahead.
I remain bullish on physical gold and silver, gold and silver mining shares, gold and silver ETFs and gold and silver mining ETFs. Remember to always do your own research as our risk appetite often differs.
Saturday, January 9, 2016
THE SIGNIFICANCE OF THE BALTIC INDEX CANNOT BE DOWNPLAYED
The significance of the data from the Baltic Index cannot be overlooked. The index measures dry bulk shipping, which means shipment of raw materials if the index falls, it means that less raw materials are being shipped across the globe. Here's what at stake:
1) Shipping companies will be hit hard. Ships are not cheap to build, and are heavily financed. So this could hit the banks too. As the index hovers at record low levels, heavy industries involved in the ship building industry will also be hit, that means more people being out of job which affect future consumption.
2) This leads to lower port activities, which impact upon the ports revenue. Ports are not cheap to build either. Like the ships, they are heavily financed and could hit the banks too. In, fact Maersk reported that they are also shipping less container goods compared to previous years. Look at the US and China export and import data which confirm Maersk's report.
3) Low shipment of raw materials means poor manufacturing. Poor manufacturing is due to poor consumption. This is reflected in the US and China ISM and PMI manufacturing data which have all fallen to disturbing levels. In fact, manufacturing is in recession in both the US and China.That means more people are out of job in the manufacturing sector, which affects future consumption
4) Lesser raw materials shipped means demand for commodities is low. That means agriculture, mining and resource industries are facing tremendous headwinds. All these industries are in deep recession; for example copper, iron ore, coal, precious metals and oil to name a few. Many employees int his sector have been laid off, again this affects future consumption.
Since many of these companies are laden with debts, expect many more debts to be rated junk, and more defaults in the months ahead. There will be a continuation in sell off of high yielding junk bonds, which leads to putting banks at risk. Think Glencore and Noble.
5) Most, if not all of the people who lost their jobs have personal debts of their own. Without a job how can they pay their debts? While the debt per se is inconsequential, taken as a whole when millions are without a job, and multiply it with tens of thousands of dollars in debts, you can guess the impact.
This is a vicious circle which will continue to turn until it exhausts itself.
The record low Baltic Index is not a small blip on the radar screen, it is an explosion that has just erupted on the radar screen.
1) Shipping companies will be hit hard. Ships are not cheap to build, and are heavily financed. So this could hit the banks too. As the index hovers at record low levels, heavy industries involved in the ship building industry will also be hit, that means more people being out of job which affect future consumption.
2) This leads to lower port activities, which impact upon the ports revenue. Ports are not cheap to build either. Like the ships, they are heavily financed and could hit the banks too. In, fact Maersk reported that they are also shipping less container goods compared to previous years. Look at the US and China export and import data which confirm Maersk's report.
3) Low shipment of raw materials means poor manufacturing. Poor manufacturing is due to poor consumption. This is reflected in the US and China ISM and PMI manufacturing data which have all fallen to disturbing levels. In fact, manufacturing is in recession in both the US and China.That means more people are out of job in the manufacturing sector, which affects future consumption
4) Lesser raw materials shipped means demand for commodities is low. That means agriculture, mining and resource industries are facing tremendous headwinds. All these industries are in deep recession; for example copper, iron ore, coal, precious metals and oil to name a few. Many employees int his sector have been laid off, again this affects future consumption.
Since many of these companies are laden with debts, expect many more debts to be rated junk, and more defaults in the months ahead. There will be a continuation in sell off of high yielding junk bonds, which leads to putting banks at risk. Think Glencore and Noble.
5) Most, if not all of the people who lost their jobs have personal debts of their own. Without a job how can they pay their debts? While the debt per se is inconsequential, taken as a whole when millions are without a job, and multiply it with tens of thousands of dollars in debts, you can guess the impact.
This is a vicious circle which will continue to turn until it exhausts itself.
The record low Baltic Index is not a small blip on the radar screen, it is an explosion that has just erupted on the radar screen.
Thursday, January 7, 2016
SPECULATION RIFE THAT SAUDI ARABIA'S RIYAL COULD DEPEG FROM US$
Speculation is rife that Saudi Arabia (SA) will depeg the Riyal from the US$ as oil price continues it freefall. This is a chart from the zerohedge.com which projected the amount of debt SA needs to borrow to buffer its budget shortfall:

SA is presently confronted with crises on several fronts:
1) The price of oil which has fallen to less than US34 per barrel. With so much reliance on oil, this has put a strain on its budget
2) Proxy war in the Middle East. This too is putting a stress on SA's finances. The war is expected to last longer as special interest groups take sides
3) SA posted a US$98B budget deficit in 2015 and projected another US$87B budget deficit in 2016. SA needs to cut down its social programmes in order to rein in the budget deficit but that would mean raising discontent among its citizens. Therefore, this subject is often threaded with caution.
One idea mooted by economists is to depeg the Riyal from the US$, and so allowing SA the much needed breathing space.
But what would be the impact globally? A depeg of the Riyal from the US$ could threaten the Petrodollar, and thus the world could see a potential collapse of the hegemony of the Petrodollar.
The above are just my opinion.
SA is presently confronted with crises on several fronts:
1) The price of oil which has fallen to less than US34 per barrel. With so much reliance on oil, this has put a strain on its budget
2) Proxy war in the Middle East. This too is putting a stress on SA's finances. The war is expected to last longer as special interest groups take sides
3) SA posted a US$98B budget deficit in 2015 and projected another US$87B budget deficit in 2016. SA needs to cut down its social programmes in order to rein in the budget deficit but that would mean raising discontent among its citizens. Therefore, this subject is often threaded with caution.
One idea mooted by economists is to depeg the Riyal from the US$, and so allowing SA the much needed breathing space.
But what would be the impact globally? A depeg of the Riyal from the US$ could threaten the Petrodollar, and thus the world could see a potential collapse of the hegemony of the Petrodollar.
The above are just my opinion.
DOW FELL 392 TO 16,514
The Dow ended down 392 points last night.
Whatever that comes out on the Friday Jobs Report has no significance. The Fed still thinks the economy in on a solid path which is pretty amusing, considering that the U6 unemployment data which includes the number of people who have left employment on their own accord or have become disillusioned in finding a job is 10%. Even scarier, if one takes unemployment to include everyone of employable age, the unemployment is closer to 20%. But the Fed still prefer to adopt the feel good rate of 5%.
High paying manufacturing jobs are being substituted by low paying service industry jobs and part time jobs. US manufacturing is already in recession. The shale oil industry is collapsing under its own weight of debts, made worse by the plunging oil price. Even banks are laying off employees. The holiday season in December has ended, and with it many part time jobs. I expect jobs to fall in the coming months as the global economy becomes much, much worse than many were led to believe.
The Fed must be quite ignorant too. How can the US be on solid footing when the best global trade indicator of all, the Baltic Index has fallen to record lows. If anything it coincides with the data that US manufacturing is in recession.
I am inclined to believe that the Fed move to raise interest rates was a face saving move, a false conviction that QE1-3 was a success.
The above is just my opinion.
Whatever that comes out on the Friday Jobs Report has no significance. The Fed still thinks the economy in on a solid path which is pretty amusing, considering that the U6 unemployment data which includes the number of people who have left employment on their own accord or have become disillusioned in finding a job is 10%. Even scarier, if one takes unemployment to include everyone of employable age, the unemployment is closer to 20%. But the Fed still prefer to adopt the feel good rate of 5%.
High paying manufacturing jobs are being substituted by low paying service industry jobs and part time jobs. US manufacturing is already in recession. The shale oil industry is collapsing under its own weight of debts, made worse by the plunging oil price. Even banks are laying off employees. The holiday season in December has ended, and with it many part time jobs. I expect jobs to fall in the coming months as the global economy becomes much, much worse than many were led to believe.
The Fed must be quite ignorant too. How can the US be on solid footing when the best global trade indicator of all, the Baltic Index has fallen to record lows. If anything it coincides with the data that US manufacturing is in recession.
I am inclined to believe that the Fed move to raise interest rates was a face saving move, a false conviction that QE1-3 was a success.
The above is just my opinion.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)